Gierl Vorstellung Enlightenment Club

After completing my habilitation in 2002 and working in Göttingen, Berlin, Florence, Los Angeles, Munich, Vienna and Hanover, I am now part of the Chair of Church History at the University of Göttingen
Published
27.5.2024

Martin Gierl

The difference between acting and happening is organization. I am interested in how the Enlightenment was organized and how it acted. How it affected society. How it organized organization. Media and their instrumentality are at the top of my list. The focus is on the processing of knowledge and information in the 18th century.

We know that Discourses negotiate things. They are practical organizational events that distribute information and determine what is to be said and what can be said. My dissertation dealt with the question of how theological controversies functioned in the Lutheran church in the late 17th century, what rules there were, how the confessional dogma was protected, but also leveled, and how the protection of confessions qua pamphlet turned into the defense of confessions qua church historiography and journal. A few years ago I published a study on Johann Christoph Gatterer, who wanted to pursue history as a science in the transition from chronicle to narrative historiography. Next year, the publication profiles of Göttingen professors from 1760 to 1830 will be published. When did they publish what in which media and how did they change from teachers who published to authors who taught? 

Selected Publications: 

Books:  

  • Geschichte als präzisierte Wissenschaft. Johann Christoph Gatterer und die Historiographie des 18. Jahrhunderts im ganzen Umfang. Stuttgart Frommann 2012.
  • Pietismus und Aufklärung. Theologische Polemik und die Kommunikationsreform der Wissenschaft am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts (Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts fĂĽr Geschichte 129). Göttingen Vandenhoeck 1997. 

Articles: 

  • Monks, Jews, pollemics, Enlightenment, in: Jonas Gerlings, Ere Nokkala (eds.), The Process of Enlightenment: Essays by and inspired by Hans Erich Bödeker (Liverpool, 2024).
  • Synchronisation, in: Lilla Krász (ed.), Wissenschaften zwischen Tradition und Innovation – Historische Perspektiven. Sciences between Tradition and Innovation – Historical Perspectives, Wien 2022, 99-122.
  • UmgemĂĽnzte Aufklärung. Die Numismatik im 18. Jahrhundert bis Eckhel, in: Bernhard Woytek, Daniela Williams (eds.), Ars critica numaria. Joseph Eckhel (1737–1798) and the Transformation of Ancient Numismatics, Wien 2022, 137-184.
  • Negotiating Ideas: The Communicative Constitution of Pietist Theology within the Lutheran Church, in: Joke Spaans, Jetze Touber (eds.), Enlightened Religion. From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic, Leiden 2019, 131-155.
  • Johann Christoph Gatterer and History as Science, in: Keith Michael Baker, Jenna M. Gibbs (eds.), Life Forms in the Thinking of the Long Eighteenth Century, Toronto 2016, 19-43.
  • Historisierung als Institutionalisierung: Johann Christoph Gatterers Verwissenschaft-lichung der Historiografie und die Konstruktion von Nation, in: Moritz Baumstark, Robert Forkel (eds.), Historisierung. Begriff - Geschichte - Praxisfelder, Stuttgart 2016, 112-128.
  • Die Göttinger Aufklärung, in: Martin van Gelderen (ed.), Lichtenberg lacht. Aufklärung und Satire, Göttingen 2015, 9-44.
  • Pietism, Enlightenment, and Modernity, in: Douglas Shantz (ed.), A Companion to German Pietism, Leiden 2015, 348-391.
  • Das Alphabet der Natur und das Alphabet der Kultur im 18. Jahrhundert. Botanik, Diplomatik, Linguistik und Ethnographie nach Carl von LinnĂ©, Johann Christoph Gatterer und Christian Wilhelm BĂĽttner, in: NTM 1, 2010, 1-27.
  • Science, Projects, Computers, and the State: Swift’s Lagadian and Leibniz’s Prussian Academy, in: Max Nowak (ed.), The Age of Projects: Changing and Improving the Arts, Literature, and Life during the Long Eighteenth Century, 1660–1820. Toronto 2008, 297-317.
  • Die Universität als Aufklärungsfabrik. Ăśber Kant, gelehrte Ware, Professoren als Fabrikgesellen und darĂĽber, wer die universitätshistorisch herausragende programmatische Schrift des 18. Jahrhunderts in Wirklichkeit geschrieben hat, in: Historische Anthropologie 13,3 (2005), 367-375.
  • Compilation and the Production of Knowledge in the Early German Enlightenment, in: Hans Erich Bödeker, Peter Hanns Reill, JĂĽrgen Schlumbohm (eds.), Wissenschaft als kulturelle Praxis, 1750-1900. Göttingen 1999, 69-104.
  • Bestandsaufnahme im gelehrten Bereich: Zur Entwicklung der "Historia literaria" im 18. Jahrhundert, in: Denkhorizonte und Handlungsspielräume. Historische Studien fĂĽr Rudolf Vierhaus zum 70. Geburtstag. Göttingen 1992, 53-80. 

Presentation

"Local Enlightenment" Lecture as part of the public lecture series "Aufklärung 2.0" at the University of Göttingen, held on January 24, 2017 in the Aula am Wilhelmsplatz.

"Local Enlightenment" Lecture as part of the public lecture series "Aufklärung 2.0"